Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 5 , Pages 449-457.e2, May 2010

Pregnancy Testing in Women of Reproductive Age in US Emergency Departments, 2002 to 2006: Assessment of a National Quality Measure

Presented as a poster at the 2008 ACEP Research Forum, October 2008, Chicago, IL.

  • Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; 617-525-8872, fax 617-264-6848
  • ,
  • Sarah A. Tibbetts, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, North Shore Medical Center, Salem, MA
  • ,
  • Jesse M. Pines, MD, MBA, MSCE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Received 6 January 2009; received in revised form 13 March 2009 and 28 July 2009; accepted 17 August 2009. published online 23 November 2009.

Study objective

We assess performance and explore definitions for a new emergency department (ED) quality measure: the proportion of women aged 14 to 50 years who have abdominal pain and receive pregnancy testing (aimed at detecting ectopic pregnancy).

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (2002 to 2006) to test trends and predictors of the new measure, using both restrictive and broad definitions from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and reason-for-visit codes, and determine the proportion of women with ectopic pregnancy who had undergone pregnancy testing. For comparison, we conducted a detailed chart review in 4 US hospitals among patients who visited the ED in 2006.

Results

Using a broad ICD-9 definition for inclusion in NHAMCS, 2.13 million women aged 14 to 50 years with abdominal pain visited an ED annually between 2002 and 2006. Of those, 33.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.5% to 35.5%) received pregnancy testing. Testing rates were materially stable, regardless of the definition used (broad or restrictive ICD-9 or reason-for-visit code). Among women with an ICD-9 diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, 55.6% (95% CI 43.7% to 67.6%) had a documented pregnancy test. In the chart review, among 200 women aged 14 to 50 years and with abdominal pain, 89.4% (95% CI 85.0% to 94.0%) were eligible for the measure; of those, 93.9% (95% CI 90.3% to 97.4%) received testing.

Conclusion

Analysis of national ED survey data demonstrated a large performance gap for a new pregnancy testing quality measure, whereas focused chart review at 4 sites showed a smaller gap. Given these discrepancies, additional study is recommended before the widespread implementation of the pregnancy testing measure as an assessment of ED performance.

 

 Supervising editor: Rita K. Cydulka, MD, MS

 Author contributions: JDS and JMP conceived the study. JDS managed the data and performed statistical analyses on NHAMCS. JDS, SAT, and JMP managed data on the 4 hospital chart review. JMP provided statistical advice on study design. JDS drafted the article, and SAT and JMP contributed substantially to its revision. JDS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication date: Available online November 22, 2009.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Please see page 450 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

PII: S0196-0644(09)01444-9

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.08.017

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 5 , Pages 449-457.e2, May 2010