Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4 , Pages 341-344, April 2010

Confusion About Epinephrine Dosing Leading to Iatrogenic Overdose: A Life-Threatening Problem With a Potential Solution

  • Manreet Kanwar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Charlene B. Irvin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Charlene B. Irvin, MD, 50572 Jefferson Ave, New Baltimore, MI 48047; 586-716-1701, fax 313-343-7620
  • ,
  • John J. Frank, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Kathryn Weber, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Howard Rosman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI

Received 10 September 2009; received in revised form 29 October 2009 and 3 November 2009; accepted 6 November 2009. published online 25 December 2009.

Epinephrine is indicated for various medical emergencies, including cardiac arrest and anaphylaxis, but the dose and route of administration are different for each indication. For anaphylaxis, it is given intramuscularly at a low dose, whereas for cardiac arrest a higher dose is required intravenously. We encountered a patient with suspected anaphylaxis who developed transient severe systolic dysfunction because of inappropriately received cardiac arrest dose, ie, larger dose given as an intravenous push. Three additional patients who experienced potentially lethal cardiac complications after receiving inappropriately higher doses intravenously were also identified. These iatrogenic errors resulted from underlying confusion by physicians about proper dosing of epinephrine for anaphylaxis. The risk of error was amplified by the need for rapid decisionmaking in critically ill anaphylactic patients. An e-mail survey of local hospitals in southeast Michigan revealed that 6 of 7 hospitals did not stock prefilled intramuscular dose syringes for emergency use in anaphylaxis. At our institution, we have introduced prefilled and appropriately labeled intramuscularly dosed epinephrine syringes in crash carts, which are easily distinguished from intravenously dosed epinephrine syringes. In this Concepts article, we describe the clinical problem of inadvertent epinephrine overdose and propose a potential solution. Epinephrine must be clearly packaged and labeled to avoid inappropriate usage and unnecessary, potentially lethal complications in patients with anaphylaxis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: E. Martin Caravati, MD, MPH

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication date: Available online January 19, 2010.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(09)01718-1

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.008

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction Notice

    Annals of Emergency Medicine July 2010 (Vol. 56, Issue 1, Page 23)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4 , Pages 341-344, April 2010