« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4
, Pages 307-315.e1
, April 2010
Clinical Features From the History and Physical Examination That Predict the Presence or Absence of Pulmonary Embolism in Symptomatic Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study
References
- . National hospital ambulatory care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2006;372:1–29
- A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:519–524
- Incidence and predictors of repeated computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:41–48
- Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients' probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:416–420
- Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:92–97
- Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:144–152
- Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98–107
- Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:165–171
- Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:53–57
- Prospective multicenter evaluation of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:772–780
- Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1247–1255
- Prospective study of clinician-entered research data in the emergency department using an internet-based system after the HIPPA privacy rule. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004;4:17
- Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:1127–1133
- Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298:2743–2753
- Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004;116:291–299
- Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–2327
- Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1343–1352
- Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1182–1189
- Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year-population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585–593
- Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809–815
- Malignancies, prothrombic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293:715–722
Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD
Author contributions: DMC and JAK participated in the conception and organization of the study. DMC, JAK, CK, CLM, HAS, KEN, PBR, and MCP participated in data collection and analysis and drafting and revising the article. DMC, JAK, CK, CLM, HAS, PBR, and MCP obtained funding. DMC, CK, CLM, HAS, PBR, and MCP participated in the writing of the study protocol. JAK had access to all the data in the study. DMC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. National Institutes of Health grants 5K23HL077404(01-05) and 1K23HL077404-01 (Dr. Courtney) and 2R42HL074415-02A1, 5R42HL074415-03, R41HL074415, R42HL074415, and R01HL074384 (Dr. Kline).
Publication date: Available online January 1, 2010.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Please see page 308 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
PII: S0196-0644(09)01735-1
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.010
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4
, Pages 307-315.e1
, April 2010
