Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 6 , Pages 503-509, June 2010

Patient Identification Errors Are Common in a Simulated Setting

  • Philip L. Henneman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA
    • Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Philip L. Henneman, MD, Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut St, Springfield, MA 01199; 413-794-5914, Fax 413-794-8070
  • ,
  • Donald L. Fisher, PhD

      Affiliations

    • College of Engineering, University Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA
  • ,
  • Elizabeth A. Henneman, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA
  • ,
  • Tuan A. Pham, BA

      Affiliations

    • College of Engineering, University Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA
  • ,
  • Megan M. Campbell, BSN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA
  • ,
  • Brian H. Nathanson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • OptiStatim, LLC, Longmeadow, MA

Received 6 January 2009; received in revised form 30 September 2009 and 27 October 2009; accepted 18 November 2009. published online 23 December 2009.

Study objective

We evaluate the frequency and accuracy of health care workers verifying patient identity before performing common tasks.

Methods

The study included prospective, simulated patient scenarios with an eye-tracking device that showed where the health care workers looked. Simulations involved nurses administering an intravenous medication, technicians labeling a blood specimen, and clerks applying an identity band. Participants were asked to perform their assigned task on 3 simulated patients, and the third patient had a different date of birth and medical record number than the identity information on the artifact label specific to the health care workers' task. Health care workers were unaware that the focus of the study was patient identity.

Results

Sixty-one emergency health care workers participated—28 nurses, 16 technicians, and 17 emergency service associates—in 183 patient scenarios. Sixty-one percent of health care workers (37/61) caught the identity error (61% nurses, 94% technicians, 29% emergency service associates). Thirty-nine percent of health care workers (24/61) performed their assigned task on the wrong patient (39% nurses, 6% technicians, 71% emergency service associates). Eye-tracking data were available for 73% of the patient scenarios (133/183). Seventy-four percent of health care workers (74/100) failed to match the patient to the identity band (87% nurses, 49% technicians). Twenty-seven percent of health care workers (36/133) failed to match the artifact to the patient or the identity band before performing their task (33% nurses, 9% technicians, 33% emergency service associates). Fifteen percent (5/33) of health care workers who completed the steps to verify patient identity on the patient with the identification error still failed to recognize the error.

Conclusion

Wide variation exists among health care workers verifying patient identity before performing everyday tasks. Education, process changes, and technology are needed to improve the frequency and accuracy of patient identification.

 

 Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MS

 Author contributions: PLH, DLH, and EAH conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. PLH and DLH supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. TAP and MMC performed data collection. BHN provided statistical analysis. PLH drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. PLH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Supported in part by the National Science Foundation (PLH, DLF, EAH) under awards CCF-0427071, CCF-0829901, 0552548, and 0313747, and the Summer Scholars Program (MMC) for the University Massachusetts Amherst and Baystate Health.

 Reprints not available from authors.

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Please see page 504 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Publication date: Available online December 23, 2009.

PII: S0196-0644(09)01791-0

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.017

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 6 , Pages 503-509, June 2010