« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4
, Pages 380-389
, April 2010
Clinical Prediction Rules: Answers to the November 2009 Journal Club
References
- . Clinical prediction rules (A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards). JAMA. 1997;277:488–494
- . Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York, NY: Springer; 2009;
- Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1085–1094
- . Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:201–209
- A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:1–8
- Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group). N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–99
- Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:772–780
- A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin). JAMA. 2000;283:749–755
- Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:1005–1009
- Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries (Refinement and prospective validation). JAMA. 1993;269:1127–1132
- Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. JAMA. 1994;271:827–832
- Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ. 2009;338:b375
- . Small area variations in health care delivery (A population-based health information system can guide planning and regulatory decision-making). Science. 1973;182:1102–1108
- Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009;338:b604
- Development of a clinical prediction model for an ordinal outcome: the World Health Organization Multicentre Study of Clinical Signs and Etiological agents of Pneumonia, Sepsis and Meningitis in Young Infants (WHO/ARI Young Infant Multicentre Study Group). Stat Med. 1998;17:909–944
- . Using full probability models to compute probabilities of actual interest to decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:17–26
- Understanding articles describing clinical prediction tools (Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group). Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1603–1612
- Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med. 2000;19:1059–1079
- . Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International; 1984;
- Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009;338:b605
- Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263
- Quantitative assessment of diagnostic radiation doses in adult blunt trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:93–97
- . Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ. 2004;328:578–580
- . Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323
- . Radiation doses among blunt trauma patients: assessing risks and benefits of computed tomographic imaging. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:99–100
- . Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006;http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/beir_vii_final.pdfAccessed October 28, 2009
- Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet. 2009;373:1455–1461
- [Whole body spiral CT in primary diagnosis of patients with multiple trauma in emergency situations]. Rofo. 1997;166:382–388
- Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: results of a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2006;141:468–473discussion 473-475
- Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough. Ann Surg. 2003;237:844–851discussion 851-852
- Blood alcohol concentration and management of road trauma patients in the emergency department. J Trauma. 2001;50:521–528
- Injuries distracting from intraabdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:145–149
- . Prospective evaluation of early missed injuries and the role of tertiary trauma survey. J Trauma. 1998;44:1000–1006discussion 1006-1007
- Preinjury warfarin use among elderly patients with closed head injuries in a trauma center. J Trauma. 2004;56:802–807
- Time to deterioration of the elderly, anticoagulated, minor head injury patient who presents without evidence of neurologic abnormality. J Trauma. 2003;54:492–496
Section editors: Tyler W. Barrett, MD; David L. Schriger, MD, MPH
Editor's Note: You are reading the twelfth installment of Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. The questions and the article they are about (Vaillancourt et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:663-671) were published in the November 2009 issue. Information about journal club can be found at http://www.annemergmed.com/content/journalclub. Readers should recognize that these are suggested answers. We hope they are accurate; we know that they are not comprehensive. There are many other points that could be made about these questions or about the article in general. Questions are rated “novice,” (
) “intermediate,” (
) and “advanced” (
) so that individuals planning a journal club can assign the right question to the right student. The “novice” rating does not imply that a novice should be able to spontaneously answer the question. “Novice” means we expect that someone with little background should be able to do a bit of reading, formulate an answer, and teach the material to others. Intermediate and advanced questions also will likely require some reading and research, and that reading will be sufficiently difficult that some background in clinical epidemiology will be helpful in understanding the reading and concepts. We are interested in receiving feedback about this feature. Please e-mail journalclub@acep.org with your comments.
PII: S0196-0644(09)01795-8
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.021
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 4
, Pages 380-389
, April 2010
