Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 1 , Pages 34-41, July 2010

The Recidivism Characteristics of an Emergency Department Observation Unit

  • Michael A. Ross, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Michael A. Ross, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 531 Asbury Circle-Annex, Ste N340, Atlanta, GA 30322; 404-778-2643, fax 404-778-2630
  • ,
  • Robin R. Hemphill, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Jerome Abramson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Kim Schwab, PA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Carol Clark, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI

Received 9 October 2009; received in revised form 28 January 2010; accepted 9 February 2010. published online 19 March 2010.

Study objective

We describe the recidivism characteristics of an adult emergency department (ED) observation unit population and determine whether rates differ according to demographic or clinical features.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study of a protocol-driven ED observation unit reviewed all discharged ED observation unit patients who returned within 14 days of discharge for an unscheduled ED visit or direct inpatient admission to the study hospital, or a proximate affiliated hospital, during 6 consecutive months. Age, sex, initial ED observation unit diagnosis, ED observation unit length of stay, and return visit disposition were determined from hospital databases and confirmed by chart review. All return visits were classified as related or unrelated to the index visit.

Results

There were 55,727 ED visits, with 4,348 patients admitted to the ED observation unit, of whom 80.7% (3,509) were discharged. Patients with or without a return visit were similar in terms of age (56.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 19.5 years]), percentage of male patients (40.0%), or initial ED observation unit length of stay (15.0 hours [SD 6.0 hours]). Of discharged ED observation unit patients, 375 (10.8%) had a return visit, of which 277 (7.9%) were related. Of return visits, 86.3% of patients had only 1 return visit, 11.6% had 2, and 2.1% had 3 or more; 4.2% of returns occurred at an affiliated hospital. Time to first return visit was clustered within the first week for related visits, with a mean time to return of 4.5 days (SD 3.9 days). On return visit, 40.2% of patients were treated and discharged from the ED, 36.2% were treated in the ED and admitted, 14.4% were treated in the ED and then the ED observation unit and discharged home, 12.3% were directly admitted to the hospital, and 2.5% were treated in the ED and then the ED observation unit and admitted. Among common conditions, related return visit rates were highest for headache (16.1%), back pain (13.8%), and abdominal pain (12.7%) and lowest for chest pain (3.6%). As a group, therapeutic protocols, and specifically painful conditions, had significantly higher related return visit rates than diagnostic protocols (10.8% versus 5.1%).

Conclusion

Patients who return after an ED observation unit visit are similar to patients who do not return in terms of age, sex, or initial length of stay. However, ED observation unit recidivism rates do differ according to observation category, with painful conditions showing the highest recidivism rates.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Please see page 35 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD

 Author contributions: MAR and KS conceived and designed the study and were involved in data collection and validation. CC obtained institutional review board approval. MAR, RRH, JA, KS, and CC were involved in data analysis and article preparation. All authors were involved in final article revisions. MR takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication date: Available online March 29, 2010.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(10)00146-0

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 1 , Pages 34-41, July 2010