Examining Emergency Department Communication Through a Staff-Based Participatory Research Method: Identifying Barriers and Solutions to Meaningful Change
Study objective
We test an initiative with the staff-based participatory research (SBPR) method to elicit communication barriers and engage staff in identifying strategies to improve communication within our emergency department (ED).
Methods
ED staff at an urban hospital with 85,000 ED visits per year participated in a 3.5-hour multidisciplinary workshop. The workshop was offered 6 times and involved: (1) large group discussion to review the importance of communication within the ED and discuss findings from a recent survey of patient perceptions of ED-team communication; (2) small group discussions eliciting staff perceptions of communication barriers and best practices/strategies to address these challenges; and (3) large group discussions sharing and refining emergent themes and suggested strategies. Three coders analyzed summaries from group discussions by using latent content and constant comparative analysis to identify focal themes.
Results
A total of 127 staff members, including attending physicians, residents, nurses, ED assistants, and secretaries, participated in the workshop (overall participation rate 59.6%; range 46.7% to 73.3% by staff type). Coders identified a framework of 4 themes describing barriers and proposed interventions: (1) greeting and initial interaction, (2) setting realistic expectations, (3) team communication and respect, and (4) information provision and delivery. The majority of participants (81.4%) reported that their participation would cause them to make changes in their clinical practice.
Conclusion
Involving staff in discussing barriers and facilitators to communication within the ED can result in a meaningful process of empowerment, as well as the identification of feasible strategies and solutions at both the individual and system levels.
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MS
Author contributions: KAC, KGE, BAB, SMD, PSP, GM, PT, MAG, and JGA conceived and designed the study. PSP, GM, and JGA obtained research funding. KAC, KGE, LMMK, and PSP supervised the conduct of the staff-based participatory research sessions. BAB and LMMK had primary responsibility for recruitment of participants. KAC, KGE, and GM served as overall facilitators for the SBPR group sessions. KAC, KGE, BAB, LMMK, SMD, PSP, and PT served as facilitators for the small group discussions. BAB and LMMK managed the data, including quality control. KAC, KGE, DMM, and LMMK analyzed the study data, and KAC provided qualitative research advice. KAC, KGE, and DMM drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. KAC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Funded by the Davee Foundation.
Please see page 615 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Publication date: Available online April 10, 2010.
PII: S0196-0644(10)00238-6
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.017
© 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
