Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 5 , Pages 458-459, May 2010

Journal Club: The NHAMCS Database, Chart Review Methods, and More on Regression Modeling

David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Editor's Capsule Summary for Schuur et al1 

What is already known on this topic

The National Quality Forum Expert Panel for Emergency Care recently endorsed a quality indicator to measure the performance of pregnancy testing in women aged 14 to 50 years who present to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain.

What question this study addressed

The performance of this quality measure was assessed in a national dataset (National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey [NHAMCS]) and by chart review at 4 academic hospital EDs to see whether the 2 methods produced consistent results.

What this study adds to our knowledge

The nationally representative database (NHAMCS) significantly underestimated the measurement of pregnancy testing compared with the chart review.

How this might change clinical practice

Although these findings will not change clinical practice, they demonstrate the dangers and difficulties of using databases to measure quality indicators.

 

PII: S0196-0644(10)00266-0

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.021

Refers to article:

  • Journal club Pregnancy Testing in Women of Reproductive Age in US Emergency Departments, 2002 to 2006: Assessment of a National Quality Measure , 23 November 2009

    Jeremiah D. Schuur, Sarah A. Tibbetts, Jesse M. Pines
    Annals of Emergency Medicine May 2010 (Vol. 55, Issue 5, Pages 449-457.e2)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 5 , Pages 458-459, May 2010