Computed Tomography Use in the Adult Emergency Department of an Academic Urban Hospital From 2001 to 2007
Study objective
There is both increasing recognition and growing scrutiny of the increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) in medicine. For our primary objective, we determine and quantify the CT utilization rate in our emergency department (ED) during the last 7 years. As a secondary objective, we compare trends in utilization for various types of CT scans.
Methods
We performed an electronic chart review at our inner-city, academic ED with an annual census of 110,000 patients. We identified all patients older than 21 years who had a CT scan performed during ED management from January 2001 to December 2007. Specific, predetermined data elements (eg, subject demographics, type of CT scan) were extracted on standardized data forms by trained abstractors. We analyzed our data with standard descriptive statistics and linear regression.
Results
The rate of CT utilization increased steadily at approximately 10 CTs per 1,000 (95% confidence interval 7.5 to 13.6 CTs) patients annually during our study period, from 51 per 1,000 patient visits in 2001 to 106 per 1,000 in 2007. Among these CTs, chest CTs increased most, with a 6-fold increase from 10 per 1,000 patient visits to 60 per 1,000. Neck CTs increased by 5-fold, from 20 per 1,000 patient visits to 100 per 1,000 patients. Similarly, the utilization of abdomen-pelvis CTs, facial bone CTs, and head CTs increased from 13 per 1,000 to 33 per 1,000 patient visits (150%), 1 per 1,000 to 2 per 1,000 patient visits (100%), and 33 per 1,000 to 53 per 1,000 patient visits (60%), respectively.
Conclusion
Recent CT utilization in our ED increased in all anatomic categories assessed, with chest CTs and neck CTs increasing the most, followed by abdomen-pelvis CTs, facial bone CTs, and head CTs.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Please see page 592 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
Supervising editors: William R. Mower, MD, PhD; Donald M. Yealy, MD
Author contributions: DEW, DHN, and KS conceived the study. JL, JK, DEW, DHN, and KS designed the study. JL and JK analyzed the data primarily. DHN and KS provided assistance with data interpretation. JL, JK, and SP wrote the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. KS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Publication dates: Available online July 10, 2010.
PII: S0196-0644(10)00499-3
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.027
© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Refers to erratum:
- Correction Notice
