Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 6 , Pages 591-596.e1, December 2010

Computed Tomography Use in the Adult Emergency Department of an Academic Urban Hospital From 2001 to 2007

Presented as a poster at the SAEM 2009 Annual Meeting, May 2009, New Orleans, LA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY

Received 26 February 2010; received in revised form 7 April 2010 and 6 May 2010; accepted 18 May 2010. published online 12 July 2010.

Study objective

There is both increasing recognition and growing scrutiny of the increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) in medicine. For our primary objective, we determine and quantify the CT utilization rate in our emergency department (ED) during the last 7 years. As a secondary objective, we compare trends in utilization for various types of CT scans.

Methods

We performed an electronic chart review at our inner-city, academic ED with an annual census of 110,000 patients. We identified all patients older than 21 years who had a CT scan performed during ED management from January 2001 to December 2007. Specific, predetermined data elements (eg, subject demographics, type of CT scan) were extracted on standardized data forms by trained abstractors. We analyzed our data with standard descriptive statistics and linear regression.

Results

The rate of CT utilization increased steadily at approximately 10 CTs per 1,000 (95% confidence interval 7.5 to 13.6 CTs) patients annually during our study period, from 51 per 1,000 patient visits in 2001 to 106 per 1,000 in 2007. Among these CTs, chest CTs increased most, with a 6-fold increase from 10 per 1,000 patient visits to 60 per 1,000. Neck CTs increased by 5-fold, from 20 per 1,000 patient visits to 100 per 1,000 patients. Similarly, the utilization of abdomen-pelvis CTs, facial bone CTs, and head CTs increased from 13 per 1,000 to 33 per 1,000 patient visits (150%), 1 per 1,000 to 2 per 1,000 patient visits (100%), and 33 per 1,000 to 53 per 1,000 patient visits (60%), respectively.

Conclusion

Recent CT utilization in our ED increased in all anatomic categories assessed, with chest CTs and neck CTs increasing the most, followed by abdomen-pelvis CTs, facial bone CTs, and head CTs.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Please see page 592 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Supervising editors: William R. Mower, MD, PhD; Donald M. Yealy, MD

 Author contributions: DEW, DHN, and KS conceived the study. JL, JK, DEW, DHN, and KS designed the study. JL and JK analyzed the data primarily. DHN and KS provided assistance with data interpretation. JL, JK, and SP wrote the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. KS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication dates: Available online July 10, 2010.

PII: S0196-0644(10)00499-3

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.027

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction Notice

    Annals of Emergency Medicine March 2011 (Vol. 57, Issue 3, Page 256)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 6 , Pages 591-596.e1, December 2010