Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 6 , Pages 591-596.e1 , December 2010

Computed Tomography Use in the Adult Emergency Department of an Academic Urban Hospital From 2001 to 2007

Presented as a poster at the SAEM 2009 Annual Meeting, May 2009, New Orleans, LA.

Received 26 February 2010 ,Revised 6 May 2010 ,Accepted 18 May 2010.

References 

  1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  2. Boone JM, Brunberg JA. Computed tomography utilization in a tertiary care university hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:132–138
  3. Broder J, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:25–30
  4. Broder J, Fordham LA. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:227–232
  5. Broder JS. CT utilization: the emergency department perspective. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(suppl 4):S664–S669
  6. Sosna J, Slasky S, Bar-ziv J. Computed tomography in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:244–247
  7. Chen JL, Dorfman GS, Li MC, et al. Use of computed tomography scanning before and after sitting in an emergency department. Acad Radiol. 1996;3:678–682
  8. Romano S, Romano L. Utilization patterns of multidetector computed tomography in elective and emergency conditions: indications, exposure risk, and diagnostic gain. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31:53–56
  9. Weiss CR, Scatarige JC, Diette GB, et al. CT pulmonary angiography is the first-line imaging test for acute pulmonary embolism: a survey of US clinicians. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:434–446
  10. Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization of patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1999 and 2003. AJR Am J Radiol. 2004;183:1093–1096
  11. Donohoo JH, Mayo-Smith WW, Pezzullo JA, et al. Utilization patterns and diagnostic yield of 3421 consecutive multidetector row computed tomography pulmonary angiograms in a busy emergency department. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:421–425
  12. DeManaco NA, Dang Q, Kapoor WN, et al. Pulmonary embolism incidence is increasing with use of spiral computed tomography. Am J Med. 2008;121:611–617
  13. Bailitz J, Starr F, Beecroft M, et al. CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma. 2009;66:1605–1609
  14. Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ, et al. Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?. J Trauma. 2003;55:222–227
  15. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58:902–905
  16. Mathen R, Inaba K, Munera F, et al. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;62:1427–1431
  17. Ahmed FZ, Zafar AM, Khan N, et al. A paradigm shift in imaging for renal colic—is it time to say good bye to an old trusted friend?. Int J Surg. 2010;9:252–256
  18. Ather MH, Faizullah K, Achakzai I, et al. Alternate and incidental diagnoses on noncontrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography for acute flank pain. Urol J. 2009;6:14–18
  19. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation—BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2005;
  20. Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Blettner M, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: design, epidemiological methods and descriptive results. Radiat Res. 2007;167:361–379
  21. Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Blettner M, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionizing radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005;331:77–92
  22. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–738
  23. Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, et al. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:461–469
  24. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–1848
  25. Steill IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, et al. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:384–390
  26. Stiell IG, Well GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357:1391–1396
  27. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:100–105
  28. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374:1160–1170
  29. Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, et al. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:134–140
  30. Stiell IG, Bennett C. Implementation of clinical decision rules in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:955–959
  31. Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1256–1261
  32. Runyon MS, Richman PB, Kline JA. Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:53–57
  33. Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. International survey of emergency physicians' priorities for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:177–182

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Please see page 592 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Supervising editors: William R. Mower, MD, PhD; Donald M. Yealy, MD

 Author contributions: DEW, DHN, and KS conceived the study. JL, JK, DEW, DHN, and KS designed the study. JL and JK analyzed the data primarily. DHN and KS provided assistance with data interpretation. JL, JK, and SP wrote the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. KS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication dates: Available online July 10, 2010.

PII: S0196-0644(10)00499-3

doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.027

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 56, Issue 6 , Pages 591-596.e1 , December 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution