Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 58, Issue 3 , Pages 250-256, September 2011

One-Year Prognosis After Syncope and the Failure of the ROSE Decision Instrument to Predict One-Year Adverse Events

  • Matthew J. Reed, MD, MA

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Research Group, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Matthew J. Reed, MD, MA, Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK EH16 4SA; 0131-242-1334
  • ,
  • Sarah S. Henderson, BSc

      Affiliations

    • College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • ,
  • David E. Newby, PhD, DM

      Affiliations

    • BHF/University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • ,
  • Alasdair J. Gray, MD, MB

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Research Group, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Received 24 October 2010; received in revised form 24 November 2010; accepted 13 December 2010. published online 03 February 2011.

Study objective

We investigate the incidence of adverse events at 1 year in the cohort of emergency department (ED) syncope patients enrolled in the original Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department (ROSE) study, the time to adverse event, and the test performance of the ROSE decision instrument to detect events at 1 year.

Methods

This report details the 1-year follow-up of adult syncope patients presenting to the ED who were enrolled into the ROSE study, a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. The primary endpoint was the combination of serious outcome and all-cause death at 1 year. Serious outcome encompassed acute myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmia, need for pacemaker/implantable defibrillator, pulmonary embolus, cerebrovascular accident, intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage, and interventional procedure or hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death and cardiovascular serious outcome at 1 year.

Results

One thousand forty-three patients were available for analysis; 162 patients (15.5%) had a primary outcome. Twenty-eight (17%) of these were within 24 hours, 56 (35%) were within 1 week, and 78 (48%) were within 1 month. The remaining 84 (52%) outcomes occurred between months 2 and 12. At 1 year, 71 (6.8%) patients had died and 76 (7.3%) had a cardiovascular serious outcome. The sensitivity and specificity of the ROSE decision instrument for 1-year serious outcome and all-cause death were, respectively, 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.9% to 78.3%) and 71.1% (95% CI 67.9% to 74.0%); for 1-year all-cause death, 76.1% (95% CI 64.2% to 85.1%) and 67.4% (95% CI 64.3% to 70.3%); and for 1-year cardiovascular serious outcome, 75.0% (95% CI 63.5% to 83.9%) and 67.5% (95% CI 64.5% to 70.5%).

Conclusion

The proportion of patients with serious outcome and all-cause death 1 year after syncope is similar to that reported in recent international syncope studies. We have defined the proportion of patients with cardiovascular serious outcome at 1 year and have shown that most events occurred in the first month, with decreased frequency of events observed after that time especially marked for cardiovascular serious outcome. More than 50% of the outcomes observed, however, occurred after the first month. The ROSE decision instrument does not perform well at predicting 1-year outcome of ED syncope patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Deborah B. Diercks, MD

 Author contributions: All authors were involved in design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. MJR takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). This work was supported by funding from a Chief Scientist Office research fellowship (CSO/CAF/06/01) for Dr. Reed. The sponsor of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data management, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and has final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Dr. Reed has received a small travel grant from Alere, formerly Inverness Medical, which was formerly Biosite, to present previous work at the International Conference of Emergency Medicine in 2010.

 Publication date: Available online February 2, 2011.

 Please see page 251 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

PII: S0196-0644(10)01931-1

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.021

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 58, Issue 3 , Pages 250-256, September 2011