Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for 30-Day Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain and Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome
Study objective
Evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain who are at low risk for acute coronary syndrome is resource intensive and may lead to false-positive test results and unnecessary downstream procedures. We seek to identify patients at low short-term risk for a cardiac event for whom additional ED investigations might be unnecessary.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled patients older than 24 years and with a primary complaint of chest pain from 3 academic EDs. Physicians completed standardized data collection forms before diagnostic testing. The primary adjudicated outcome was acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, or death of cardiac or unknown cause within 30 days. We used recursive partitioning to derive the rule and validated the model with 5,000 bootstrap replications.
Results
Of 2,718 patients enrolled, 336 (12%) experienced a cardiac event within 30 days (6% acute myocardial infarction, 10% revascularization, 0.2% death). We developed a rule consisting of the absence of 5 predictors: ischemic ECG changes not known to be old, history of coronary artery disease, pain typical for acute coronary syndrome, initial or 6-hour troponin level greater than the 99th percentile, and age greater than 50 years. Patients aged 40 years or younger required only a single troponin evaluation. The rule was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval 97.2% to 100.0%) and 20.9% specific (95% confidence interval 16.9% to 24.9%) for a cardiac event within 30 days.
Conclusion
This clinical prediction rule identifies ED chest pain patients at very low risk for a cardiac event who may be suitable for discharge. A prospective multicenter study is needed to validate the rule and determine its effect on practice.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editor: Judd E. Hollander, MD
Author contributions: All authors contributed significantly to the study and the preparation of the article. EPH, JJP, ASJ, GAW, and IGS were responsible for the conception and design of the study. LAC, VT, DA, and ATS assisted with data acquisition. EPH and RJB were responsible for data acquisition, data entry, and preliminary analysis. EPH and GAW performed all statistical analyses. All authors participated in the drafting and multiple revisions of the article and gave final approval of the submitted work. EPH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The study was funded by a Fellow-to-Faculty Transition award from the American Heart Association, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and the Emergency Medicine Foundation (award 0775030N). The study was also supported by the Ontario Innovation Fund and the University of Ottawa Department of Emergency Medicine.
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
Please see page 116 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
Earn CME Credit: Continuing Medical Education is available for this article at http://www.ACEP-EMedHome.com.
Publication date: Available online September 1, 2011.
PII: S0196-0644(11)01343-6
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.026
© 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
