Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 117-120, February 1988

Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering

Received 19 May 1987; received in revised form 28 September 1987; accepted 16 November 1987.

The effects of pH buffering on the pain of administration and efficacy of three local anesthetics (1% lidocaine, 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 1% mepivacaine) were investigated in a randomized, prospective, double-blind study of 25 adult volunteers. Plain and buffered solutions of the three local anesthetics were prepared, and a 0.5 intradermal injection of each was administered. Pain of anesthetic infiltration was rated from zero to ten. The area of anesthetized skin surrounding each injection site was measured at time intervals following each injection. Buffering the local anesthetics significantly reduced the mean quantitative pain estimates compared to the nonbuffered controls: 1) 1% lidocaine compared with buffered 1% lidocaine, 4.9 ± 0.4 versus 1.1 ± 0.2 (P < 10 −6); 2) 1% lidocaine with epinephrine compared with buffered 1% lidocaine with epinephrine, 5.1 ± 0.4 versus 1.8 ± 0.4 (P < 10−6); and 3) 1% mepivacaine compared with buffered 1% mepivacaine, 5.1 ± 0.4 versus 0.9 ± 0.2 (P < 10−6). Onset, extent, and duration of skin anesthesia were not statistically altered by pH buffering. The pain of local anesthetic administration can be dramatically reduced by buffering the local anesthetic prior to its infiltration. Anesthetic efficacy is not compromised, and patient acceptance may be significantly increased.

keywords: anesthetic local administration

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the University Association for Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, May 1987.

PII: S0196-0644(88)80293-2

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 117-120, February 1988