Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 720-729, December 1999

Checking for Breathing: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Capability of Emergency Medical Services Personnel, Physicians, Medical Students, and Medical Laypersons☆☆★★

Presented at the Fourth Congress of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), Copenhagen, Denmark, June 1998 (received award in best oral presentations).

From the Institute for Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care,* the Departments of Surgery and Anesthesiology,§ Downtown Medical Center, University of Munich, Medical School, Munich, Germany

Received 11 August 1998; received in revised form 8 April 1999; accepted 29 April 1999.

Abstract 

Study objective: International guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend determination of unconsciousness, breathlessness, and absence of pulse to diagnose cardiorespiratory arrest. Thus far, there have been no scientifically proven data available regarding the quality of assessing breathlessness. The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of checking for breathing in an emergency situation, to determine the necessary amount of time until diagnosis, and to document used techniques. Methods: Four different populations were tested for their ability to assess breathlessness: emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, physicians, medical students, and laypersons. Each participant was asked to perform the diagnostic procedure twice, first with a breathing or not-breathing unresponsive test person and then with a modified megacode manikin (with the possibility of simulated respiratory function). The order of testing and the respiratory status were strictly randomized. Diagnostic accuracy, time interval to diagnosis, and used techniques were documented. Results: A total of 261 persons were tested in 522 trials, with a median time interval of 12 seconds for obtaining a diagnosis. Regarding all participants, the correct diagnosis was achieved in 81.0% (EMS personnel, 89.7%; physicians, 84.5%; medical students, 78.4%; laypersons, 71.5%). Only 55.6% of all participants showed correct diagnostic skills (EMS personnel, 91.3%; physicians, 51.5%; medical students, 61.9%; laypersons, 18.5%). Conclusion: Checking for breathing was shown to be mostly inaccurate and unreliable. This diagnostic procedure takes more time than recommended in international guidelines. Therefore CPR training should focus more on the determination of breathlessness. Also, the guidelines for CPR should be revised. [Ruppert M, Reith MW, Widmann JH, Lackner CK, Kerkmann R, Schweiberer L, Peter K: Checking for breathing: Evaluation of the diagnostic capability of emergency medical services personnel, physicians, medical students, and medical laypersons. Ann Emerg Med December 1999;34:720-729.]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address for reprints: Matthias Ruppert, MD, Arbeitskreis Notfallmedizin und Rettungswesen (ANR), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 20, 80336 Munich, Germany; 49 89 51 60 49 50, fax 49 89 51 60 49 52; E-mail matthias.ruppert@anr.med.uni-muenchen.de.

☆☆ This article is copublished in Notfall und Rettungsmedizin 1999;2:18-28.

 0196-0644/99/$8.00 + 0

★★ 47/1/99699

PII: S0196-0644(99)70097-1

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 720-729, December 1999