Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 500-509, May 1999

Prospective, Randomized Trial of Template-assisted Versus Undirected Written Recording of Physician Records in the Emergency Department☆☆★★

Presented at the Texas College of Emergency Physicians Annual Meeting, Galveston, TX, April 1998, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, May 1998.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX.

Received 13 July 1998; received in revised form 19 November 1998 and 7 January 1999; accepted 18 January 1999.

Address for correspondence: Keith A Marill, MD, TTUHSC—Department of Emergency Medicine, 6090 Surety Drive, Suite 412,El Paso, TX 79905; 915-771-6482, fax 915-774-4905; E-mail emmekam@ttuhsc.edu.

Abstract 

Study objective: To determine whether use of the T-System (Emergency Services Consultants, Irving, TX) template-generated medical documentation system (1) decreases physician evaluation time in the emergency department, (2) increases gross billing under the 1997 Health Care Financing Administration guidelines by minimizing downcoding caused by inadequate documentation, and (3) increases physician satisfaction with the documentation process, compared with the undirected written narrative format. Methods: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled, convenience trial of documentation with the T-System of ED templates versus undirected written documentation was conducted in the ED of a county-owned, university-affiliated hospital. All patients seen between the hours of 7 AM and 10 PM during a 16-day period were included. The intervention was varying the method of documentation of the emergency physician. Adequacy of randomization to the 2 documentation groups was assessed by comparing ED triage classification, patient disposition, level of training of the evaluating physician, and whether ED consultation with other services occurred. Outcome measurements included emergency physician total evaluation and treatment time, professional bill, and satisfaction, as evaluated by a questionnaire completed after the study period. The 2 documentation groups were compared by an intention-to-treat analysis and by Student’s t test and the median test as appropriate. Results: A total of 1,228 patient encounters were included. Emergency physician total evaluation and treatment time with template-directed documentation was 4.6 minutes less than with undirected recording, a difference that was not significant (95% confidence interval [CI], –9.2 to 18.3). Gross billing was $29.60 more per patient (95% CI, $22.20 to $37.00) with the T-System, as assessed by our hospital coders. This difference was caused by a mean .50 (95% CI, .39 to .60) higher level of evaluation and management coding. Physicians preferred the T-System (P <.0005). Conclusion: Use of template-assisted documentation in the ED was associated with higher gross billing and physician satisfaction but no significant decrease in emergency physician total evaluation time. [Marill KA, Gauharou ES, Nelson BK, Peterson MA, Curtis RL, Gonzalez MR: Prospective, randomized trial of template-assisted versus undirected written recording of physician records in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med May 1999;33:500-509.]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Neither the authors nor the independent agency used to audit the charts had any financial interest or arrangement with the producers of the T-System.

☆☆ Reprints not available from the authors.

 0196-0644/99/$8.00 +0

★★ 47/1/97456

PII: S0196-0644(99)70336-7

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 500-509, May 1999