Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 510-515, May 1999

Increasing Compliance With the Residency Review Committee Requirements for Follow-up in Academic Emergency Departments☆☆

Presented at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, May 1996.

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, the New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn,* and the Department of Emergency Medicine, the Lincoln Medical and Health Center, Bronx, NY

Received 12 May 1998; received in revised form 2 December 1998; accepted 18 December 1998.

Abstract 

Study Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess patient follow-up activities and changes in compliance with the Residency Review Committee follow-up requirements among emergency medicine residency training programs over a 12-year period. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of residency directors of all accredited programs in emergency medicine listed in the Graduate Medical Education Directory was performed in 1996. Program director responses were matched with the results of our study group’s previous surveys performed in 1984, 1988, and 1992. The survey requested information regarding the mechanism for follow-up on patients admitted to the hospital, as well as those treated and released from the emergency department. Results: All residency programs responded to the survey. Seventy-four percent of the residency programs surveyed reported a formal system of follow-up for admitted patients, and 51% had a formal system in place for discharged patients. Inpatient follow-up mechanisms included follow-up case conferences (56%), discharge summaries (55%), follow-up book/cards (47%), or follow-up rounds (11%). Outpatient follow-up mechanisms included routine telephone follow-up (86%), follow-up document (37%), ED follow-up clinic (24%), or home visits (<1%). During the past 12 years, compliance with the Residency Review Committee requirements for follow-up activity has improved from 38% to 78% for inpatients and from 33% to 52% for outpatients. Conclusion: Emergency medicine residency training programs report an increasing compliance with residency requirements for ED patient follow-up. However, a significant number of programs still lack a formal mechanism. Compliance continues to be much better for patients admitted to the hospital than those treated and released. Specific suggestions and model follow-up mechanisms are described.[Gaeta TJ, Osborn HH, Emergency Medicine Follow-up Study Group: Increasing compliance with the Residency Review Committee requirements for follow-up in academic emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med May 1999;33:510-515.]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address for reprints: Theodore Gaeta, DO, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, 506 Sixth Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215; 718-780-5040, fax 718-780-3153; E-mail tgaeta@pol.net.

☆☆ 0196-0644/99/$8.00 + 0

 47/1/97272

PII: S0196-0644(99)70337-9

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 510-515, May 1999