Advertisement

Anticipated Changes in Reimbursements for US Outpatient Emergency Department Encounters After Health Reform

      Study objective

      We study how reimbursements to emergency departments (EDs) for outpatient visits may be affected by the insurance coverage expansion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as previously uninsured patients gain coverage either through the Medicaid expansion or through health insurance exchanges.

      Methods

      We conducted a secondary analysis of data (2005 to 2010) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We specified multiple linear regression models to examine differences in the payments, charges, and reimbursement ratios by insurance category. Comparisons were made between 2 groups to reflect likely movements in insurance status after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation: (1) the uninsured who will be Medicaid eligible afterward versus Medicaid insured, and (2) the uninsured who will be Medicaid ineligible afterward versus the privately insured.

      Results

      From 2005 to 2010, as a percentage of total ED charges, outpatient ED encounters for Medicaid beneficiaries reimbursed 17% more than for uninsured individuals who will become Medicaid eligible after Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation: 40.0% versus 34.0%, mean absolute difference=5.9%, 95% confidence interval 5.7% to 6.2%. During the same period, the privately insured reimbursed 39% more than for uninsured individuals who will not be Medicaid eligible after Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation: 54.0% versus 38.8%, mean absolute difference=15.2%, 95% confidence interval 12.8% to 17.6%.

      Conclusion

      Assuming historical reimbursement patterns remain after Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation, outpatient ED encounters could reimburse considerably more for both the previously uninsured patients who will obtain Medicaid insurance and for those who move into private insurance products through health insurance exchanges. Although our study does provide insight into the future, multiple factors will ultimately influence reimbursements after implementation of the act.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ACEP Member Login
      ACEP Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Congressional Budget Office. Estimates for the insurance coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act updated for the recent Supreme Court Decision. July 2012. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43472-07-24-2012-CoverageEstimates.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2013.

        • Ginde A.A.
        • Lowe R.A.
        • Wiler J.L.
        Health insurance status change and emergency department use among US adults.
        Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 642-647
        • Heavrin B.S.
        • Fu R.
        • Han J.H.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of statewide emergency department utilization following Tennessee Medicaid disenrollment.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1121-1128
        • Chen C.
        • Scheffler G.
        • Chandra A.
        Massachusetts' health care reform and emergency department utilization.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: e25
      2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The MEPS Data and Methods Manual. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Rockville, MD. 2013. [Updated August 2013.]. Available at: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/. Accessed November 6, 2012.

      3. Foster RS. Estimated financial effects of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” as amended. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Department of Health and Human Services. April 22, 2010. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/ActuarialStudies/downloads/PPACA_2010-04-22.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2013.

      4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2010 emergency department summary tables. 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2010_ed_web_tables.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2013.

      5. Advisory Board Company. Where each state stands on ACA's Medicaid expansion: a roundup of what each state's leadership has said about their Medicaid plans. c2013. [Updated June 14, 2013] Available at: http://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2012/11/09/MedicaidMap. Accessed September 18, 2013.

      6. Horne LLP. Let the payment reductions begin. c2013. Available at: http://www.horne-llp.com/industries/health-care/resources/health-care-reform--advantages--pitfalls/let-the-payment-reductions-begin. Accessed February 5, 2013.

        • Hsia R.Y.
        • MacIsaac D.
        • Baker L.C.
        Decreasing reimbursements for outpatient emergency department visits across payer groups from 1996 to 2004.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51: 265-274