External Defibrillator Damage Associated With Attempted Synchronized Dual-Dose Cardioversion

      The simultaneous use of 2 external defibrillators to administer either dual or sequential cardioversion or defibrillation for refractory cardiac arrhythmias is increasing in both the out-of-hospital and inhospital settings. Using 2 defibrillators to administer higher energy levels than can be achieved with a single defibrillator is considered off-label and is currently not part of published advanced cardiac life support guidelines. We report the first case in which the use of dual-dose cardioversion was associated with external defibrillator damage. Because defibrillator damage, especially if undetected, jeopardizes patient safety and off-label medical product use may void the manufacturer’s warranty, this case should urge users to proceed with caution when contemplating this technique.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ACEP Member Login
      ACEP Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Neubert D. Using double sequential defibrillation to help cardiac arrest patients. Available at: Accessed February 7, 2017.

      2. City of New Orleans. Region one protocol effort. Available at: Accessed February 7, 2017.

        • Cabanas J.G.
        • Myers J.B.
        • Williams J.G.
        • et al.
        Double sequential external defibrillation in out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation: a report of ten cases.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015; 19: 126-130
        • Gerstein N.S.
        • Shah M.B.
        • Jorgensen K.M.
        Simultaneous use of two defibrillators for the conversion of refractory ventricular fibrillation.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015; 29: 421-424
        • Cortez E.
        • Krebs W.
        • Davis J.
        • et al.
        Use of double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 108: 82-86
        • Kabukcu M.
        • Demircioglu F.
        • Yanik E.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous double external DC shock technique for refractory atrial fibrillation in concomitant heart disease.
        Jpn Heart J. 2004; 45: 929-936
        • Saliba W.
        • Juratli N.
        • Chung M.K.
        • et al.
        Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 2031-2034
        • Marrouche N.F.
        • Bardy G.H.
        • Frielitz H.J.
        • et al.
        Quadruple pads approach for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 1321-1324
        • Deakin C.D.
        • Kerber R.E.
        Dual sequential defibrillation: does one plus one equal two?.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 108: A1-A2
        • Ross E.M.
        • Redman T.T.
        • Harper S.A.
        • et al.
        Dual defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort analysis.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 106: 14-17
        • Merlin M.A.
        • Tagore A.
        • Bauter R.
        • et al.
        A case series of double sequence defibrillation.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 550-553
      3. Rio Rancho. Rio Rancho Fire and Rescue EMS treatment guidelines—revised January 2017. Available at: Accessed May 1, 2017.

        • Waller C.
        • Callies F.
        • Langenfeld H.
        Adverse effects of direct current cardioversion on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes: is external cardioversion contraindicated in patients with permanent pacing systems?.
        Europace. 2004; 6: 165-168
        • Levine P.A.
        • Barold S.S.
        • Fletcher R.D.
        • et al.
        Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 1: 1413-1422
        • Altamura G.
        • Bianconi L.
        • Lobianco F.
        • et al.
        Transthoracic DC shock may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients.
        Pace. 1995; 18: 194-198
        • Link M.S.
        • Berkow L.C.
        • Kudenchuk P.J.
        • et al.
        Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S444-S464
        • Neumar R.W.
        • Shuster M.
        • Callaway C.W.
        • et al.
        Part 1: executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S315-S367
        • Schulman P.M.
        • Rozner M.A.
        • Sera V.
        • et al.
        Patients with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        Med Clin North Am. 2013; 97: 1051-1075
        • Laskey W.
        • Awad K.
        • Lum J.
        • et al.
        An analysis of implantable cardiac device reliability. The case for improved postmarketing risk assessment and surveillance.
        Am J Ther. 2012; 19: 248-254
      4. United States Food & Drug Administration. Medsun reports. Available at: Accessed February 7, 2017.