Advertisement

Patients’ Perspectives on Outcomes of Care After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

      Study objective

      Much effort has been expended to understand what care experiences patients value in the emergency department (ED), yet little is known about which outcomes patients value after ED care. Our goal is to define outcomes of ED care that are valued by patients discharged from the ED, with the goal of informing the development of a patient-reported outcome measure for ED care.

      Methods

      We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with patients recruited during their care at 1 of 2 EDs and interviewed in either English or French 1 to 9 days after their visit. Patients who were hospitalized were excluded. Interviews focused on perceived outcomes of care since the ED visit and expectations of care before the ED visit. We identified themes with standard descriptive content analysis techniques and a modified version of the constant comparative method, drawing on grounded theory methods.

      Results

      We interviewed 46 patients in English (n=38) or French (n=8). Participants with diverse reasons for seeking care appeared to value common outcomes from ED care that centered around 4 themes: understanding the cause and expected trajectory of their symptoms; reassurance; symptom relief; and having a plan to manage their symptoms, resolve their issue, or pursue further medical care. These themes were also reflected in the expectations participants recalled having when they decided to seek care in the ED.

      Conclusion

      The 4 outcomes defined constitute areas for improvement and will inform the development of an ED patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Consideration should be given to measuring patient-reported outcomes separately from patient experience.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ACEP Member Login
      ACEP Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Institute of Medicine
        Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC2001
        • Farley H.
        • Enguidanos E.R.
        • Coletti C.M.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paper.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 64: 351-357
        • Lecky F.
        • Benger J.
        • Mason S.
        • et al.
        • on behalf of the IFEM Quality Symposium Working Group
        The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department.
        Emerg Med J. 2014; 31: 926-929
        • Schull M.J.
        • Guttmann A.
        • Leaver C.A.
        • et al.
        Prioritizing performance measurement for emergency department care: consensus on evidence-based quality of care indicators.
        CJEM. 2011; 13: 300-309
        • Rising K.L.
        • Hudgins A.
        • Reigle M.
        • et al.
        “I’m just a patient”: fear and uncertainty as drivers of emergency department use in patients with chronic disease.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 5: 536-543
        • Olthuis G.
        • Prins C.
        • Smits M.-J.
        • et al.
        Matters of concern: a qualitative study of emergency care from the perspective of patients.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 63: 311-319.e2
        • Kanzaria H.K.
        • Mattke S.
        • Detz A.A.
        • et al.
        Quality measures based on presenting signs and symptoms of patients.
        JAMA. 2015; 313: 520-522
        • Griffey R.T.
        • Pines J.M.
        • Farley H.L.
        • et al.
        Chief complaint-based performance measures: a new focus for acute care quality measurement.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 65: 387-395
        • National Quality Forum
        Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Performance Measurement.
        National Quality Forum, Washington, DC2013: 35
        • Rothman M.L.
        • Beltran P.
        • Cappelleri J.C.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues.
        Value Health. 2007; 10: S66-S75
        • Black N.
        Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.
        BMJ. 2013; 346: f167
        • Cella D.
        • Riley W.
        • Stone A.
        • et al.
        The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 6: 1179-1194
        • Lavallee D.C.
        • Chenok K.E.
        • Love R.M.
        • et al.
        Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35: 575-582
        • Mokkink L.B.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Patrick D.L.
        • et al.
        The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 737-745
        • O’Brien B.C.
        • Harris I.B.
        • Beckman T.J.
        • et al.
        Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.
        Acad Med. 2014; 89: 1245-1251
        • Bos N.
        • Sizmur S.
        • Graham C.
        • et al.
        The accident and emergency department questionnaire: a measure for patients’ experiences in the accident and emergency department.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 22: 139-146
        • Picker Institute Europe
        Development of the Questionnaire for Use in the NHS Emergency Department 2008.
        Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, England2008
        • Weinick R.M.
        • Becker K.
        • Parast L.
        • et al.
        Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Survey.
        RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA2014 (Available at:) (Accessed June 9, 2017)
      1. NRC Picker Canada. Emergency Department Experience Survey. Markham, Ontario, Canada: NRC Picker Canada; 2005.

        • Cooke T.
        • Watt D.
        • Wertzler W.
        • et al.
        Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II—a cross-sectional survey.
        CJEM. 2006; 8: 148-157
        • Howie J.G.R.
        • Heaney D.J.
        • Maxwell M.
        • et al.
        Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 738-743
        • Andén A.
        • Andersson S.-O.
        • Rudebeck C.-E.
        Satisfaction is not all—patients’ perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study.
        BMC Fam Pract. 2005; 6: 1-8
        • Marcinowicz L.
        • Rybaczuk M.
        • Grebowski R.
        • et al.
        A short questionnaire for measuring the quality of patient visits to family practices.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2010; 22: 294-301
        • Kvale S.
        • Brinkmann S.
        InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA2009
        • Magasi S.
        • Ryan G.
        • Revicki D.
        • et al.
        Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.
        Qual Life Res. 2011; 21: 739-746
        • Brod M.
        • Tesler L.E.
        • Christensen T.L.
        Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.
        Qual Life Res. 2009; 18: 1263-1278
        • Patrick D.L.
        • Burke L.B.
        • Gwaltney C.J.
        • et al.
        Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.
        Value Health. 2011; 14: 967-977
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Charmaz K.
        Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods.
        in: Denzin N.K. Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA2000: 509-535
        • Trout A.
        • Magnusson A.R.
        • Hedges J.R.
        Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say?.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7: 695-709
        • Boudreaux E.D.
        • O’Hea E.L.
        Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications for practice.
        J Emerg Med. 2004; 26: 13-26
        • Boudreaux E.D.
        • d’Autremont S.
        • Wood K.
        • et al.
        Predictors of emergency department patient satisfaction: stability over 17 months.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 51-58
        • Taylor C.
        Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine.
        Emerg Med J. 2004; 21: 528-532
        • Manary M.P.
        • Boulding W.
        • Staelin R.
        • et al.
        The patient experience and health outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 201-203
        • Black N.
        • Varaganum M.
        • Hutchings A.
        Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23: 534-542
        • Rising K.L.
        • Padrez K.A.
        • O’Brien M.
        • et al.
        Return visits to the emergency department: the patient perspective.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 4: 377-386.e3
        • Coia P.
        Medical reassurance and patients’ responses.
        J Psychosom Res. 1998; 45: 377-386
        • Derksen F.
        • Bensing J.
        • Lagro-Janssen A.
        Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63: e76-e84
        • Pincus T.
        • Holt N.
        • Vogel S.
        • et al.
        Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.
        Pain. 2013; 154: 2407-2416
        • Vashi A.
        • Rhodes K.V.
        “Sign right here and you’re good to go”: a content analysis of audiotaped emergency department discharge instructions.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57: 315-322.e1
        • Crane J.A.
        Patient comprehension of doctor-patient communication on discharge from the emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 1997; 15: 1-7
        • Samuels-Kalow M.E.
        • Stack A.M.
        • Porter S.C.
        Effective discharge communication in the emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60: 152-159
        • Guss D.A.
        • Gray S.
        • Castillo E.M.
        The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 2014; 46: 560-566
        • Dainty K.N.
        • Seaton B.
        • Laupacis A.
        • et al.
        A qualitative study of emergency physicians’ perspectives on PROMS in the emergency department.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006012)
        • Yiadom M.Y.A.B.
        • Ward M.J.
        • Chang A.M.
        • et al.
        Consensus statement on advancing research in emergency department operations and its impact on patient care.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22: 757-764