Is the Mallampati Score Useful for Emergency Department Airway Management or Procedural Sedation?

      We review the literature in regard to the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility of the Mallampati score as might be pertinent and applicable to emergency department (ED) airway management and procedural sedation. This 4-level pictorial tool was devised to predict difficult preoperative laryngoscopy and intubation, but is now also widely recommended as a routine screening element before procedural sedation. The literature evidence demonstrates that the Mallampati score is inadequately sensitive for the identification of difficult laryngoscopy, difficult intubation, and difficult bag-valve-mask ventilation, with likelihood ratios indicating a small and clinically insignificant effect on outcome prediction. Although it is important to anticipate that patients may have a difficult airway, there is no specific evidence that the Mallampati score augments or improves the baseline clinical judgment of a standard airway evaluation. It generates numerous false-positive warnings for each correct prediction of a difficult airway. The Mallampati score is not reliably assessed because independent observers commonly grade it differently. It cannot be evaluated in many young children and in patients who cannot cooperate because of their underlying medical condition. The Mallampati score lacks the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility required to supplement a standard airway evaluation before ED airway management or procedural sedation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ACEP Member Login
      ACEP Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Mallampati S.R.
        Clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation (hypothesis).
        Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983; 30: 316-317
        • Mallampati S.R.
        • Gatt S.P.
        • Gugino L.D.
        • et al.
        A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.
        Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985; 32: 429-434
        • Samsoon G.L.
        • Young J.R.
        Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study.
        Anaesthesia. 1987; 42: 487-490
        • Baker P.
        Assessment before airway management.
        Anesthesiol Clin. 2015; 33: 257-278
        • Roth D.
        • Pace N.L.
        • Lee A.
        • et al.
        Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5: CD008874
        • Cote C.J.
        • Wilson S.
        • American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; AAP
        Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 138 (e20161212-e20161212)
        • Early D.S.
        • Lightdale J.R.
        • Vargo J.J.
        • et al.
        • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee
        Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 327-337
        • Dumonceau J.-M.
        • Riphaus A.
        • Schreiber F.
        • et al.
        Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline—updated June 2015.
        Endoscopy. 2015; 47: 1175-1189
        • Olsen J.W.
        • Barger R.L.
        • Doshi S.K.
        Moderate sedation: what radiologists need to know.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201: 941-946
        • Royal College of Emergency Medicine
        Best practice guideline—pharmacological agents for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Version 2017.
        (Available at:)
        • Coté C.J.
        • Wilson S.
        Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016.
        Pediatr Dent. 2016; 38: 13-39
        • Sakles J.C.
        • Douglas M.J.K.
        • Hypes C.D.
        • et al.
        Management of patients with predicted difficult airways in an academic emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 2017; 53: 163-171
        • Levitan R.M.
        • Everett W.W.
        • Ochroch E.A.
        Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44: 307-313
        • Bair A.E.
        • Caravelli R.
        • Tyler K.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of the preoperative Mallampati airway assessment in emergency department patients.
        J Emerg Med. 2010; 38: 677-680
        • Apfelbaum J.L.
        • Hagberg C.A.
        • Caplan R.A.
        • et al.
        Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.
        Anesthesiology. 2013; 118: 251-270
        • Lundstrøm L.H.
        • Vester-Andersen M.
        • Moller A.M.
        • et al.
        Danish Anaesthesia Database. Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177 088 patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107: 659-667
        • Shiga T.
        • Wajima Z.
        • Inoue T.
        • et al.
        Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance.
        Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 429-437
        • Lee A.
        • Fan L.T.
        • Gin T.
        • et al.
        A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway.
        Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 1867-1878
        • Vannucci A.
        • Cavallone L.F.
        Bedside predictors of difficult intubation: a systematic review.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 82: 69-83
        • Ezri T.
        • Warters R.D.
        • Szmuk P.
        • et al.
        The incidence of class “zero” airway and the impact of Mallampati score, age, sex, and body mass index on prediction of laryngoscopy grade.
        Anesth Analg. 2001; 93: 1073-1075
        • Tham E.J.
        • Gildersleve C.D.
        • Sanders L.D.
        • et al.
        Effects of posture, phonation and observer on Mallampati classification.
        Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68: 32-38
        • Iyer M.S.
        • Pitetti R.D.
        • Vitale M.
        Higher Mallampati scores are not associated with more adverse events during pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia.
        West J Emerg Med. 2018; 19: 430-436
        • Heinrich S.
        • Birkholz T.
        • Irouschek A.
        • et al.
        Incidences and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia: a single-center analysis of 102,305 cases.
        J Anesth. 2013; 27: 815-821
        • Wilson M.E.
        • John R.
        Problems with the Mallampati sign.
        Anaesthesia. 1990; 45: 486-487
        • Mansano A.M.
        • Módolo N.S.P.
        • Silva L.M.D.
        • et al.
        Bedside tests to predict laryngoscopic difficulty in pediatric patients.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 83: 63-68
        • Healy D.W.
        • LaHart E.J.
        • Peoples E.E.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the Mallampati evaluation in neutral or extended cervical spine positions: a retrospective observational study of >80 000 patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 2016; 116: 690-698
        • Inal M.T.
        • Memis D.
        • Sahin S.H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of different tests to determine difficult intubation in pediatric patients.
        Rev Bras Anesthesiol. 2014; 64: 391-394
        • Heinrich S.
        • Birkholz T.
        • Ihmsen H.
        • et al.
        Incidence and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in 11,219 pediatric anesthesia procedures.
        Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22: 729-736
        • Rafique N.B.
        • Khan F.A.
        Comparison of Mallampati test, thyromental distance and distance from tragus to nares for predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients.
        Open J Anesthesiol. 2014; 4: 104-109
        • Santos A.P.
        • Mathias L.A.
        • Gozzani J.L.
        • et al.
        Difficult intubation in children: applicability of the Mallampati index.
        Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011; 61: 156-162
        • Aggarwal A.
        • Sharma K.R.
        • Verma U.C.
        Evaluation of difficult airway predictors in pediatric population as a clinical investigation.
        J Anesth Clin Res. 2012; 3: 1-5
        • Min J.J.
        • Kim G.
        • Kim E.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic validity of clinical airway assessments for predicting difficult laryngoscopy using a grey zone approach.
        J Int Med Res. 2016; 44: 893-904
        • Lundstrøm L.H.
        • Møller A.M.
        • Rosenstock C.
        • et al.
        High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database.
        Anesthesiology. 2009; 110: 266-274
        • De Jong A.
        • Molinari N.
        • Pouzeratte Y.
        • et al.
        Difficult intubation in obese patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications in the operating theatre and in intensive care units.
        Br J Anaesth. 2015; 114: 297-306
        • Reed M.J.
        • Dunn M.J.G.
        • McKeown D.W.
        Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department?.
        Emerg Med J. 2005; 22: 99-102
        • Soyuncu S.
        • Eken C.
        • Cete Y.
        • et al.
        Determination of difficult intubation in the ED.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2009; 27: 905-910
        • Kheterpal S.
        • Healy D.
        • Aziz M.F.
        • et al.
        Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group.
        Anesthesiology. 2013; 119: 1360-1369
        • Kheterpal S.
        • Martin L.
        • Shanks A.M.
        • et al.
        Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics.
        Anesthesiology. 2009; 110: 891-897
        • Kheterpal S.
        • Han R.
        • Tremper K.K.
        • et al.
        Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation.
        Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 885-891
        • Leoni A.
        • Arlati S.
        • Ghisi D.
        • et al.
        Difficult mask ventilation in obese patients: analysis of predictive factors.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2014; 80: 149-157
        • Langeron O.
        • Masso E.
        • Huraux C.
        • et al.
        Prediction of difficult mask ventilation.
        Anesthesiology. 2000; 92: 1229-1236
        • El-Ganzouri A.R.
        • McCarthy R.J.
        • Tuman K.J.
        • et al.
        Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index.
        Anesth Analg. 1996; 82: 1197-1204
        • Cattano D.
        • Panicucci E.
        • Paolicchi A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: an Italian survey of 1956 patients.
        Anesth Analg. 2004; 99: 1774-1779
        • Khan I.
        • Chatterjee A.B.
        • Bellinger C.R.
        • et al.
        Sedation for bronchoscopy and complications in obese patients.
        Respiration. 2016; 92: 158-165
        • Hung A.
        • Marshall J.
        • Barnett S.
        • et al.
        Risk factors and outcomes of reversal agent use in moderate sedation during endoscopy and colonoscopy.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 50: e25-e29
        • Agostoni M.
        • Fanti L.
        • Gemma M.
        • et al.
        Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 266-275
        • Menon S.M.
        • Sampangiramaiah S.
        • Mathew M.
        Cross sectional observational study performed to see for relation of Mallampati score and extended Mallampati score with body mass index.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11: UG01-UG03
        • Lopez K.T.
        • Theivanayagam S.
        • Asombang A.W.
        • et al.
        Airway assessment of patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.
        South Med J. 2014; 107: 764-767
        • Adamus M.
        • Jor O.
        • Vavreckova T.
        • et al.
        Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation.
        Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011; 155: 275-281
        • Eberhart L.H.J.
        • Arndt C.
        • Cierpka T.
        • et al.
        The reliability and validity of the upper lip bite test compared with the Mallampati classification to predict difficult laryngoscopy: an external prospective evaluation.
        Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: 284-289
        • Karkouti K.
        • Rose D.K.
        • Ferris L.E.
        • et al.
        Inter-observer reliability of ten tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation.
        Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43: 554-559
        • Oates J.D.
        • Macleod A.D.
        • Oates P.D.
        • et al.
        Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation.
        Br J Anaesth. 1991; 66: 305-309
        • Rosenstock C.
        • Gillesberg I.
        • Gatke M.R.
        • et al.
        Inter-observer agreement of tests used for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49: 1057-1062
        • Kandray D.P.
        • Juruaz D.
        • Yacavone M.
        • et al.
        Inter-rater reliability of the Mallampati classification for patients in a dental hygiene clinic.
        J Dent Hyg. 2013; 87: 134-139
        • De Jong A.
        • Molinari N.
        • Terzi N.
        • et al.
        • AzuRea Network for the Frida-Rea Study Group
        Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 187: 832-839
        • Joshi R.
        • Hypes C.D.
        • Greenberg J.
        • et al.
        Difficult airway characteristics associated with first-attempt failure at intubation using video laryngoscopy in the intensive care unit.
        Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14: 368-375
        • Schriger D.L.
        • Elder J.W.
        • Cooper R.J.
        Structured clinical decision aids are seldom compared with subjective physician judgment, and are seldom superior.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70: 338-344.e3
        • Green S.M.
        • Schriger D.L.
        • Yealy D.M.
        Methodologic standards for interpreting clinical decision rules in emergency medicine: 2014 update.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 64: 286-291
        • Schriger D.L.
        • Newman D.H.
        Medical decisionmaking: let's not forget the physician.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 59: 219-220
        • Green S.M.
        • Schriger D.L.
        The sinking STONE: what a failed validation can teach us about clinical decision rules.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 67: 433-436
        • Green S.M.
        • Roback M.G.
        • Krauss B.S.
        • et al.
        Unscheduled procedural sedation: a multidisciplinary consensus practice guideline.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2019; 73: e51-e65