- Clinical policy: use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for the management of acute ischemic stroke in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66: 322-333.e31
- Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma.Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57: 387-404
- Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with seizures.Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 62: 59-68
- Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting.J Emerg Nurs. 2009; 35: e5-e40
- The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 663-694
- Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1250-1251
- “Spin” in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy.Med Law. 2007; 26: 511-525
- The spin doctor: an alternative model of public relations.Public Relat Rev. 1994; 20: 19-27
- Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.JAMA. 2010; 303: 2058-2064
- Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.PloS One. 2018; 16: e2005761
- Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: the SPIIN randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 4120-4126
- Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer.Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 1238-1244
- Reporting of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant primary outcomes published in high-impact surgical journals.Ann Surg. 2017; 265: 1141-1145
- “Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes.Trials. 2013; 14: 371
- Protection of human subjects.(Available at:)Accessed August 15, 2018)
Wayant C, Vassar M. Central protocol for assessing spin in the biomedical literature. 2018. Available at: https://osf.io/eu5t2. Accessed May 2, 2019.
- Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 210
- A review of spin and bias use in the early intervention in psychosis literature.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014; 16 (PCC.13r01586)
- Data interpretation in analgesic clinical trials with statistically nonsignificant primary analyses: an ACTTION systematic review.J Pain. 2015; 16: 3-10
- Study design and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of chronic idiopathic or autoimmune urticaria: review.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e70717
- Deficient reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority randomized clinical trials in HIV patients: a systematic review.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e63272
- Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of “spin.”.Radiology. 2013; 267: 581-588
- Overinterpretation of clinical applicability in molecular diagnostic research.Clin Chem. 2009; 55: 786-794
- Ondansetron treatment reduces rotavirus symptoms—a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0186824
- Prehospital use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotection in acute stroke.N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 528-536
- Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115: 2613-2619
- Factors associated with results and conclusions of trials of thiazolidinediones.PLoS One. 2009; 4: e5826
- Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?.JAMA. 2003; 290: 921-928
- Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study.BMJ. 2007; 335: 1202-1205
- Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others.PLoS Med. 2007; 4: e184
- Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1: MR000006
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy; Committee on Responsible Science. Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC2018
- CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.Int J Surg. 2012; 10: 28-55
- Commentary: scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric.BMJ. 1995; 310: 987-988
- Users’ guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.BMJ. 2004; 329: 1093-1096
- Policy: twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims.Nature. 2013; 503: 335-337
Please see page 424 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
Supervising editor: David L. Schriger, MD, MPH. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at https://www.annemergmed.com/editors.
Author contributions: JB, CW, and MV were responsible for the conception and design of the work. VR-V, JR, and JB were responsible for the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to drafting and critically revising the work for intellectual content and approved the final version to be published. All authors take responsibility for the paper as a whole.
All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide feedback to Annals on this particular article.